FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs)
Q1. Why can't the NEXRAD be reprogrammed to filter out returns from wind turbines?
Q2. What is the NEXRAD Program doing to solve the WTC problem?
Q3. How close is a NEXRAD-based solution to the WTC problem?
Q4. Will Dual Polarization reduce WTC?
Q5. Can we attend local/county wind farm
permitting meetings and protest projects that will be too close to our radar?
Q6. Does the DOC, NOAA, or the NWS have any legal or statutory
recourse to halt wind farm developments that will severely impact the NEXRAD radar?
Q1. Why can't the NEXRAD be reprogrammed to
filter out returns from wind turbines?
REPLY: The NEXRAD’s clutter filter scheme only
removes clutter that is stationary, such as buildings, trees, terrain. Unfortunately,
both precipitation and wind turbine blades are moving, and the filter is not applied to
them. Trying to filter out moving blades will inevitable alter how the radar sees
real precipitation. Here’s why. A single radar volume sample (gate) at 30 miles
from the radar is approximately a square kilometer. Thus, for a typical wind farm,
the radar may receive reflected energy from several turbines within that gate, each
with multiple rotating blades. These numerous rotating blades appear similar to
precipitation, which is also made up of numerous distributed moving targets.
Yes, there are fewer blades than raindrops within a sample volume, but the blades
make up for their smaller numbers by reflecting significantly more energy back to the radar.
However, the radar has no way to determine the number of targets it is sampling within a
particular gate.
Also, the reflected energy is constantly changing as the blades change their
pitch and orientation relative to radar, with some blades moving towards the radar,
some moving away, and some not appearing to move at all (perpendicular). This is
analogous to the movement of precipitation within a volume sample. Thus, the reflected
microwave energy (signal) from moving turbine blades looks too much like the reflected
energy (signal) from precipitation. Reprogramming the signal processor to differentiate
between them is a complex problem that may not be solvable. Studies are underway at the
University of Oklahoma and other institutions to find a solution.
However, at this time there is no known way to filter out turbine blade clutter.
Q2. What is the NEXRAD Program doing to solve
the WTC problem?
REPLY: The NEXRAD Program has provided research funds to
the University of Oklahoma to devise potential short-term and long-term solutions. Short-term
efforts are focusing on automatic identification and flagging of wind turbine-corrupted
data. Advanced signal processing techniques, such as non-stationary clutter filtering,
are also being explored as sophisticated and robust solutions, but these are long-term
efforts. In addition, innovative radar designs, such as adaptive phased array antennas,
are being explored as potential solutions. Finally, knowledge-based techniques, which
would exploit information (blade phase, rotation speed, etc.) from wind turbines are
being conceived. The Atmospheric Radar Research Center (ARRC) at the University of
Oklahoma plans to make use of its Electromagnetic Microphysics Laboratory (EML) for
this final concept. With the appropriate funding stream, experiments could be conducted
to simulate a working turbine within the lab, providing the ability to test knowledge-based
algorithms in a controlled setting.
Q3. How close is a NEXRAD-based solution to the WTC problem?
REPLY: There may not be a NEXRAD-based solution
(i.e. no signal processing solution). The simplest solutions, such as identifying
and flagging wind turbine-corrupted data, are at least 5 years away and they are
only partial solutions. Signal processing solutions, in general, are very complicated
and are at least 5 years away, assuming an acceptable solution can even be found.
Q4. Will Dual Polarization reduce WTC?
REPLY: We do not know yet. We currently do not have any dual polarization
data from wind turbines. However, we are interested in obtaining data to determine if dual
polarization shows any promise to reduce WTC impacts on the NEXRAD radars.
Q5. Can we attend local/county wind farm permitting meetings
and protest projects that will be too close to our radar?
REPLY: Yes, you can attend the meetings. No, you cannot protest projects.
NOAA General Counsel has advised that you may attend these meetings, but you may not
protest or try to halt the project. Any comments made need to be factual. The ROC can
assist sites in this area.
Q6. Does the DOC, NOAA, or the NWS have any legal or statutory recourse to
halt wind farm developments that will severely impact the NEXRAD radar?
REPLY: In short, no. However, the Radar Operations Center has found that many wind farm developers are conscientious and want to do the right thing. The key is making them aware of the
impacts to the radar before they have invested significant time and money in the project.