www.roc.noaa.gov 
NOAA logo - Select to go to the NOAA homepage National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration   Select to go to the NWS homepage
National Weather Service
 

 
 

POSSIBLE WIND TURBINE CLUTTER (WTC) MITIGATION ACTIONS FOR DEVELOPERS


The best mitigation technique is to avoid locating wind turbines in the radar line of sight (RLOS) of a NEXRAD. This strategy may be achieved by distance or terrain masking. Mitigation of impacts, if turbines are in the RLOS, can be achieved by reducing the number of turbines in the RLOS, the amount of blade penetration into the RLOS, greater separation from the radar, or through selective turbine siting; e.g., to reduce the azimuthal extent of the turbines with respect to the radar. Each situation requires case-by-case analysis.

The NEXRAD Program is looking into another promising option for developers to consider. This involves the developer entering into discussions with the local NWS Weather Forecast Office (WFO) or military Base Weather Station to define severe weather scenarios under which the wind farm operators will stop the wind turbines to allow the WFO to receive uncluttered radar data from the wind farm area. Stopping the turbines will typically eliminate any clutter and is the next best thing after not siting in the RLOS. The Wind Farm Operator and WFO could develop an informal document detailing the weather scenarios, points of contact on each side, and the agreed-to operating procedures.

 In summary, here is a prioritized list of mitigation options for developers to consider.
     1. Site Wind Turbines (WT) out of the Radar Line of Site (RLOS) (see Fig 1 below).
     2. If within the RLOS, stop the turbines during Severe Weather (this typically eliminates WTC in most circumstances, except when WTs are very close to the radar)
     3. Within the RLOS, site WTs as far as possible from the radar (assuming level terrain) (see Fig 2 below).
     4. In hilly areas, use terrain masking by placing WTs on the far side of the hill below the peak (see Fig 3 below)
     5. Try to minimize azimuthal spread relative to radar, especially when siting very close to the radar (see Fig 4 below).
     6. If azimuthal spread is large, provide open radials from radar by bunching turbines into groups with space between these groups. When the wind turbines are very close (within 10 miles) to the radar, this provides clear radials of data when multipath effects (ghosting, beam blockage) are occurring down radial from the wind farm (see Fig 5 below).
     7. When choosing the height of wind turbines, if shorter wind turbines would not penetrate into the RLOS, we would prefer the shorter turbines. However if shorter turbines would still be in the RLOS, then fewer, taller turbines over a smaller area may be preferable (see Fig 6 below).


 

 

  

 

  

 

  


  


  


  


Future Considerations:
     It may be advantageous for the wind industry to investigate the potential benefits of using “stealth” technology in wind turbine design to reduce the radar cross section of the tower and blades.
 
 Blue Diamond Bullet INTRODUCTION - WIND ENERGY DEVELOPERS -
 Blue Diamond Bullet MAP OF NEXRAD LOCATIONS & RADAR LINE OF SIGHT (RLOS) -
 Blue Diamond Bullet HOW TO SUBMIT YOUR PROJECT FOR EVALUATION BY FEDERAL AGENCIES -
 Blue Diamond Bullet HOW WIND TURBINES IMPACT THE NEXRAD DOPPLER WEATHER RADAR -
 Blue Diamond Bullet HOW NEXRAD CAN IMPACT WIND TURBINES AND MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL -
 Blue Diamond Bullet HOW THE ROC ANALYZES WIND FARM PROPOSALS -
 Blue Diamond Bullet NEXRAD PROGRAM EFFORTS TO MITIGATE INTERFERENCE -
 Blue Diamond Bullet FAQs -
 Blue Diamond Bullet LINKS AND RESEARCH PAPERS -
 Blue Diamond Bullet FEEDBACK -


Applications | Engineering | Operations | Program | Contact Us

National Weather Service
Radar Operations Center
Page last modified: Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Page Author: ROC Webmaster
Disclaimer
Plugins
Privacy Policy